Bureaucratical Fight of Workers Group Movement in Industrial Worlds

Authors

  • Panya Tedsungnon Kasem Bundit University, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47667/ijppr.v3i2.152

Keywords:

Industry, Oligarchy, Egalitarian

Abstract

Oligarchy and egalitarian social movement are two topics that are covered in this article, along with poverty, increasing deprivation, and egalitarian movement. In order to trace the overall consequences of industrial developments, the debate has a tendency toward oligarchy. The earlier Commercial Revolution must have had certain deviations in order to indicate the beginnings of the nation-state as well as tendencies of industrialization and revolution. The development of industry led to the formation of a wage-dependent working class in urban settings, which was a necessary but oppressive division of the workforce. The English Revolution of the seventeenth century, the American and French Revolutions of the eighteenth century, and the bourgeois revolution, which was a political theory founded on the inherent rights of life, liberty, property, revolution, and popular sovereignty are all examined in this article.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ando, C. (2000). Imperial ideology and provincial loyalty in the Roman Empire. University of California Press.

Deakin, S. (2013). Addressing labour market segmentation: The role of labour law. Cambridge: Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.

Edmonstone, J. (2016). Complex adaptive leadership: embracing paradox and uncertainty.

Hudson, P. (2014). The industrial revolution. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Iversen, T. (2001). 2 The Dynamics of Welfare State Expansion: Trade Openness, De-industrialization, and Partisan Politics 10. The new politics of the welfare state, 45.

McGaughey, E. (2017). Democracy or Oligarchy? Models of Union Governance in the UK, Germany and US. Models of Union Governance in the UK, Germany and US (June 29, 2017). King's College London Law School Research Paper, (2017-35).

Obolensky, M. N. (2014). Complex adaptive leadership: Embracing paradox and uncertainty. Gower Publishing, Ltd..

Ormrod, D., & David, O. (2003). The rise of commercial empires: England and the Netherlands in the age of mercantilism, 1650-1770 (Vol. 10). Cambridge University Press.

Pincus, S. (2012). Rethinking mercantilism: political economy, the British empire, and the Atlantic world in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. The William and Mary Quarterly, 69(1), 3-34.

Rodan, G. (2016). The political economy of Singapore's industrialization: national state and international capital. Springer.

Rule, J. (2014). The labouring classes in early industrial England, 1750-1850. Routledge.

Takim, L. N. (2012). The heirs of the prophet: charisma and religious authority in Shi'ite Islam. SUNY Press.

Trigg, J. W. (1981). The Charismatic Intellectual: Origen's Understanding of Religious Leadership. Church History, 50(1), 5-19.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-27

How to Cite

Tedsungnon, P. (2022). Bureaucratical Fight of Workers Group Movement in Industrial Worlds . International Journal Papier Public Review, 3(2), 6-13. https://doi.org/10.47667/ijppr.v3i2.152