Digital Bibliographic Information Platforms - a New Approach to Research Methodology

Auteurs

  • Juraev Tuychi Norbutayevich Norbutayevich

##plugins.pubIds.doi.readerDisplayName##:

https://doi.org/10.47667/ijppr.v6i2.368

Mots-clés:

article, bibliographic, Mendeley, literature, publication, scientific

Résumé

In the current academic landscape, scientific research results are published through both traditional print and electronic formats, overseen by accredited institutions such as publishers and universities. This study explores the use of modern bibliographic data platforms, with a focus on Mendeley, to enhance the preparation and publication of scientific research in accordance with international standards. A comprehensive analysis was conducted involving 84 participants—including master's students, PhD candidates, and researchers from Karshi State University—to assess their awareness and application of bibliographic tools and methodologies. Findings reveal that while 73% of respondents recognize the IMRAD structure as beneficial for scientific writing, 27% lack familiarity with international formatting standards. Furthermore, a significant number of participants were either unaware of or lacked proficiency in using virtual libraries like Mendeley, Google Scholar, and ResearchGate. Only 18% used these tools effectively, while 54% had only partial knowledge or usage experience. The research also identifies a practical gap in integrating citation tools within commonly used software like Microsoft Word. Based on these insights, the study highlights the need for targeted training programs and workshops on research methodologies and bibliographic tools in higher education. Encouraging educators and researchers to utilize platforms such as Scopus, Science Direct, and Mendeley can enhance scholarly productivity and visibility. Ultimately, the adoption of modern bibliographic systems plays a critical role in improving the quality and credibility of academic publications and advancing scientific communication.

##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##

##plugins.generic.usageStats.noStats##

Références

Ahrens, T., & Chapman, C. S. (2006). Doing qualitative field research in management accounting: Positioning data to contribute to theory. Accounting, organizations and society, 31(8), 819-841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2006.03.007

Alavi, M., & Gallupe, R. B. (2003). Using information technology in learning: Case studies in business and management education programs. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 2(2), 139-153.

Chaudhry, B., Wang, J., Wu, S., Maglione, M., Mojica, W., Roth, E., ... & Shekelle, P. G. (2006). Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Annals of internal medicine, 144(10), 742-752. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-144-10-200605160-00125

Chudaeva, A. A., Mantulenko, V. V., Zhelev, P., & Vanickova, R. (2019). Impact of digitalization on the industrial enterprises activities. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 62, p. 03003). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20196203003

Gunasekaran, A., Papadopoulos, T., Dubey, R., Wamba, S. F., Childe, S. J., Hazen, B., & Akter, S. (2017). Big data and predictive analytics for supply chain and organizational performance. Journal of Business Research, 70, 308-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.004

Heer, J., & Shneiderman, B. (2012). Interactive dynamics for visual analysis: A taxonomy of tools that support the fluent and flexible use of visualizations. Queue, 10(2), 30-55. https://doi.org/10.1145/2133416.2146416

Kaklauskas, A., Zavadskas, E. K., Seniut, M., Stankevic, V., Raistenskis, J., Simkevičius, C., ... & Gribniak, V. (2013). Recommender system to analyze student’s academic performance. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(15), 6150-6165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.05.034

Kusumaningsih, D., Darmayanti, R., & Latipun, L. (2024). How Mendeley Software Enhances Students' Scientific Writing through Mentorship and Training Opportunities. Jurnal Inovasi Dan Pengembangan Hasil Pengabdian Masyarakat, 2(1), 46-58. https://doi.org/10.61650/jip-dimas.v2i1.297

Ovsiannikov, I. A., Arbib, M. A., & McNeill, T. H. (1999). Annotation technology. International journal of human-computer studies, 50(4), 329-362. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1999.0247

Piran, M. J., & Tran, N. H. (2024). Enhancing Research Methodology and Academic Publishing: A Structured Framework for Quality and Integrity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.05683. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2412.05683

Pranckutė, R. (2021). Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The titans of bibliographic information in today’s academic world. Publications, 9(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9010012

Shanti, R., Siregar, H., Zulbainarni, N., & Tony. (2023). Role of digital transformation on digital business model banks. Sustainability, 15(23), 16293. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316293

Timotheou, S., Miliou, O., Dimitriadis, Y., Sobrino, S. V., Giannoutsou, N., Cachia, R., ... & Ioannou, A. (2023). Impacts of digital technologies on education and factors influencing schools' digital capacity and transformation: A literature review. Education and information technologies, 28(6), 6695-6726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11431-8

Visser, M., Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2021). Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic. Quantitative science studies, 2(1), 20-41. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00112

Wardat, Y., & Al Ali, R. (2025). How to Publish Research Papers in SCOPUS-Indexed General and Educational Journals. Educational Process: International Journal, 14, e2025072.

##submission.downloads##

Publiée

2025-06-13